I’m going to make this as short as possible. This weekend, Jen and I drove 7 hours both ways to north of Buffalo. We missed the wedding (on purpose), and spent 20 hours total there, all for the sake of going to the post-wedding family BBQ. On the way up we visited the Hess family.
***
Two year old Johnie has one joke.
“Knock knock,” he says.
“Who’s there?”
“Billy!” he enthusiastically replies.
“Billy who?” you ask, to which you will receive a blank stare. Billy was at the door. That’s it. He doesn’t have a last name, and it’s strange to even ask.
***
Jen, myself and the babysitter got stuck with kid duty in the AM after Ron and Jess had to run out for activities. We had to get 4 year old Tommy dressed, though he would prefer to run around in underwear all day. I asked him what he wanted to wear. He insisted on his Star Wars halloween costume, telling me that he would just put it on to show me, then get real clothes. He reneged on his deal once he was in it, declaring that he wanted to go to the park in it.
“If I let you wear this to the park,” I asked, “what will you say when people ask you who the silly boy is that is wearing that costume and carrying a light saber?”
“I will tell them,” Tommy replied, complete with dramatic pause and theatrical pose, “‘I am Hans Solo!’”
***
Jake and Tommy spent a lot of time playing Mario 3 for the original Nintendo system while we were visiting. At one point, Tommy got a warp to a different level, which was apparently not common. As Jake yelled happily in the background, Tom, who is still learning to pronounce words, tore into our room exclaiming “I got a wop! I got a wop!”
The boys paused the game for the night, but came back to it the next morning. Still excited, Jake informed me again that Tommy had found a warp. Tommy chimed in, “I got a wop, Uncle Eric, I got a wop!!”
“Tommy, his name is Mario,” I quipped, over his head.
“Please don’t teach the boys antiquated racial slurs,” Jen chided.
***
My brother called as we were somewhere near the PA/NY border. He and I chatted for a few minutes, before I gave the phone to Jen so that they could talk about bridal party clothes as Steve is planning the guy’s attire. They spoke for a few minutes. When they were finishing, Jen asked Steve if he had anything left to say to me.
“Uhh, not really. Uhhh…tell him to go eat sh*t or something.”
***
As we were driving through rural New York on a back road, Jen was reading her textbook.
“Look,” I said as we drove through a town which was having a craft fair celebrating the labor day weekend, “they’re having a thing.”
I have problems with finding the right word sometimes. “Oh, a thing?” she replied, amused.
“Yes. That’s what we call them in New York,” I authoritatively informed her. “A town thing. We have one in Goshen too. I had a booth there. I sold Stuff. I had a booth selling stuff at the town thing.”
“Where all specific nouns are illegal,” she retorted.
***
Finally, we got to the family picnic. Jen’s elderly grandparents, both showing their age, were only planning on staying for an hour or two before heading back to the nursing home. Jen, who only sees them every three or so years, went over to talk to them.
“I better go too,” I announced to the family members that I was chatting with, “it might be my last chance.”
I had intended to communicate that I might not get another opportunity since they were leaving soon. The smattering of stifled giggles from the family belayed the fact that they understood me to be claiming they’d be dead soon. Which is beside the point.
Sour Grapes
October 23, 2009 by E1st
A few years ago, my character was called into question by a yellow journalist. A couple years after that, it happened again, this time by a random lady. I know how it is. The urge to defend yourself is strong. It eats at you; someone thinks that you are deficient, you want to make amends. You want to feel justified before your accusers, you need vindication! Someone, some arbiter somewhere, has got to stand up and say “this person is right, and you, oh accuser, are wrong.” It is an exceptionally strong compulsion, the defense of one’s character.
In some ways, I can understand the urges behind the actions of a member of my church. Jilted by his wife, he took the fight to the church (which had supported her), setting up a mirror website, spepchurch.com, as opposed to the real one, spepchurch.org. As the story goes, his wife determined that he was emotionally abusive toward her. The church, whose job it is to adjudicate between congregants on such matters, agreed with her – admonishing him and not disallowing a divorce.
You don’t need to spend much time on this guy’s website before you understand why someone would want a divorce from him. I want to divorce him. He, meanwhile, has tried to vindicate himself. He insists up and down, the only “biblical” reasons for divorce are abandonment and adultery. He did neither of these. Interestingly, his definition allows for all varieties of abuse within the marital bound. According to this definition, he could beat her within inches of her life and she’d still be stuck with him. It belays a profoundly simple theological misunderstanding.
This is a person who would like to hold his wife to the letter of the law. The Bible specifies grounds for biblical divorce. In other places, it specifies behaviors suitable for mankind. It furthermore indicates that the Holy Spirit is available to inform redeemed individuals on right and wrong – the letter of the law is no longer that which justifies one before God, but instead the nature of one’s heart.
The poor fellow’s is broken. Instead of working toward cleansing himself of whatever it is that makes him so obnoxious and self-righteous (and, according to his wife, whose opinion matters, abusive), he has mounted a very high horse in an attempt to vindicate himself. This seems like one who has never been wrong. He’s saved by grace, because the construct fits him, but he’s the sort who never really needed it. How dare his wife leave him! She’s NOT ALLOWED! And moreover, she’s a sinner for trying, and the church, in condoning this, is wrong.
Forget the Bible extracts and woeful Jesus-speak in his posts. There’s more to it than knowing the words and concocting an unassailable Biblical position. You also, you know sometimes at least, need to love. There ain’t none of that in making a whitehouse.com type website to sham a church. It’s downright childish – preaching one’s spiritual defense from such a pitiful pulpit is not what the Bible means when it says we should take care of our problems in house so as to not shame Christ’s name among non-Christians.
The church, rightly I think, decided that it should preemptively send a letter to the entire congregation, informing us of this shadow site and pointing people to the correct one. The church informed us of the proceedings and invited us to pray for a peaceful resolution. The church, unsurprisingly, took the high ground.
There are few people who would take this fellows side here. Most modern people have little sympathy for those who are abusive to their spouses. Most nominal Christians have no particular problems with divorce. Most evangelical Christians recognize that in cases of abuse, physical or emotional, it is not sinful to escape that situation. The only people who would fall on his side here are those who are otherwise radicalized or jilted. I expect to see him show his truer colors some day. You can tell a tree by its fruit. Who will vindicate him then?
Posted in Religious, Social Commentaries | 7 Comments »